Bibliographic record
Abstract
On considre souvent qu'il n'y a pas de place dans la philosophie de Spinoza pour le problme de la thodice ou pour la question de la conciliation de la justice, de la sagesse et de la puissance divines avec la prsence apparente de mal et d'imperfection dans le monde. Son rejet d'un Dieu providentiel semblerait carter soi seul toute approche spinoziste du problme. Toutefois, Spinoza a bel et bien beaucoup dire sur la question de la thodice. En niant l'immortalit personnelle de l'me, Spinoza offre de manire, je crois, pleinement consciente une rponse l'approche traditionnelle qu'on trouve au sein de la philosophie juive mdivale, celle qui repose sur les rcompenses attendre de la vertu dans le monde venir . De plus, on trouve effectivement les composantes de l'approche de Spinoza dans cette tradition antrieure, et la conception de Spinoza est une continuation naturelle d'un courant l'intrieur du rationalisme juif mdival.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".