MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044843862 · doi:10.3917/eh.051.0057

The Danish Welding Institute and FORCE technology, 1940-2005: technical standardization and the shaping of business

2008· article· fr· W2044843862 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEntreprises et histoire · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMetallurgy and Cultural Artifacts
Canadian institutionsMinistère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDanishStandardizationWeldingInternational standardizationPolitical scienceEngineeringBusinessMechanical engineeringLawPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Cette contribution analyse les processus par lesquels trois régimes de standards techniques, nationaux et internationaux, ont façonné l’histoire du Danish Welding Institute (devenu aujourd’hui FORCE Technology) depuis la Seconde Guerre mondiale. La théorie des clubs avec adhésion volontaire est mobilisée afin de rendre compte des interactions complexes liant gouvernements nationaux et entreprises en matière d’écriture et d’application de standards. Cette théorie permet de mieux comprendre les différences existant entre les régimes de standards, le dernier régime ayant été établi dans le cadre du Marché Unique européen. L’article se conclut par une discussion sur leur rôle dans la formation de l’Europe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.009
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it