MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044846038 · doi:10.4000/belphegor.393

Dorian Gray, Dracula, Peter Pan : trois refus de la modernité

2011· article· fr· W2044846038 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Isabelle Cani

Bibliographic record

VenueBelphégor · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicHistorical and Scientific Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtDraculaEthnologyArt historySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dorian Gray, Dracula, Peter Pan : trois figures mythiques du refus du temps qui passe apparaissent en deux décennies à Londres au tournant des XIXe et XXe siècles. Et si leur refus du temps était un refus de ce temps-là ? Héros ou anti héros, les personnages mythiques sont confrontés à la même modernité déroutante – le nouvel empire de l’argent, de la technique et des institutions – mais on n’échappe pas à son époque, et quand l’individualisme forcené s’oppose au conformisme docile, cela s’apparente finalement à ce combat contre le double que donnent à voir les trois œuvres. Impossible de cesser à volonté d’être modernes, même si Peter Pan lorsqu’il choisit l’enfance et le pays de Jamais incarne le refus le plus radical, celui qui ne cesse de nous faire rêver.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.439
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBelphégorSame topicHistorical and Scientific StudiesFrench-language works237,207