MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044881189 · doi:10.1063/1.3140272

Computing vibrational energy levels by using mappings to fully exploit the structure of a pruned product basis

2009· article· en· W2044881189 on OpenAlexafffund
Jason Cooper, Tucker Carrington

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsBasis (linear algebra)Hamiltonian (control theory)DiagonalBasis functionAlgorithmEigenvalues and eigenvectorsLanczos resamplingMatrix (chemical analysis)Basis setComputer scienceRepresentation (politics)Applied mathematicsMathematicsStatistical physicsMathematical optimizationPhysicsMathematical analysisQuantum mechanicsGeometryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For the purpose of calculating (ro-)vibrational spectra, rate constants, scattering cross sections, etc. product basis sets are very popular. They, however, have the important disadvantage that they are unusably large for systems with more than four atoms. In this paper we demonstrate that it is possible to efficiently use a basis set obtained by removing, from a product basis set, functions associated with the largest diagonal Hamiltonian matrix elements. This is done by exploiting the fact that for every factor of every term in the Hamiltonian, there is a basis-set order in which the matrix representation of the factor is block diagonal. Due to this block diagonality the Lanczos algorithm can be implemented efficiently. Tests with model Hamiltonians with as many as 32 coordinates illustrate the merit of the ideas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.149
Threshold uncertainty score0.487

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207