Epitopes associated with mature spores not recognized on Kudoa thyrsites from recently infected Atlantic salmon smolts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Atlantic salmon Salmo salar skeletal muscle was examined for Kudoa thyrsites by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and positive fish were further examined by in situ hybridization (ISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC). The infection was detected in 42% of salmon by PCR following a 60 d exposure to infective seawater at a temperature of 10 degrees C (= 600 degree-days, degreeD). The parasite was detected by ISH in skeletal and cardiac muscle but not in gill, kidney, spleen, liver, stomach, intestine, pyloric caeca and skin. None of 4 monoclonal antibodies (2F4, 4H2, 1H2, 3E8) raised against mature K. thyrsites spores reacted with the stages identified by ISH following a 600 degreeD exposure, but they did react with ISH-identified stages following a 1600 degreeD exposure. In contrast, a polyclonal antibody reacted with K. thyrsites stages in salmon with both 600 and 1600 degreeD exposures, suggesting that the parasite observed in 600 degreeD infections represents an antigenically distinct developmental stage of K. thyrsites.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".