Electrosurgery in Patients With Pacemakers/Implanted Cardioverter Defibrillators
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Brief Despite improved protective mechanisms, pacemakers and implanted cardioverter defibrillators are subject to interference from various sources. An effective means of hemostasis, electrocautery generates electromagnetic interference and may be problematic in this patient population. Reported complication rates are low, but the consequences can be serious. Recommendations regarding the management of patients with implanted cardiac devices become increasingly significant both as the number of patients with devices increases and the number of out-of-hospital/minor surgery procedures performed increases. This article provides surgeons and anesthetists with practical recommendations for use of electrocautery in patients with pacemakers or implantable cardiac defibrillators. The hazards of electromagnetic interference in patients with pacemakers or implanted cardioverter defibrillators are outlined, and protective measures are described.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it