Recrutement, mobilité professionnelle et reproduction sociale des artisans de Saint-Denis-sur-Richelieu, 1740-1810
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Jusqu’à ce jour, les travaux sur les artisans du Canada préindustriel ont permis de mieux saisir les principaux traits familiaux et sociaux de certains métiers. Toutefois, la majorité des auteurs se sont surtout intéressés aux artisans urbains. Cet article vise à mieux définir le portrait social des artisans ruraux de la région de Montréal au tournant du XIXe siècle. Nous cherchons plus spécifiquement à définir les modalités de recrutement et la cohésion sociale de l’ensemble des artisans d’une communauté rurale spécifique : Saint-Denis-sur-Richelieu. Nous définissons d’abord l’origine géographique et sociale des familles artisanales de cette paroisse. Puis, nous vérifions le degré de mobilité professionnelle de ces artisans à l’intérieur de leur cycle de vie. Nous abordons finalement les aspects de la mobilité ou de l’enracinement des artisans dans cette région sous l’angle de la reproduction familiale et sociale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".