MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044943849 · doi:10.2118/141305-pa

Calculation of Permeability Tensors for Unstructured Gridblocks

2010· article· en· W2044943849 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Canadian Petroleum Technology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPermeability (electromagnetism)DiagonalGridTensor (intrinsic definition)Unstructured gridGeologyGeometryMathematicsComputer scienceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Geostatistical models of reservoir properties are high resolution with many grid cells; it is impractical to use them directly in flow simulation because of computational costs. Upscaling techniques are applied to average small-scale permeability values to larger flow simulation blocks. In cases where unstructured grids are used or the geological features inside the gridblock are not aligned with the block geometry, symmetric or full-permeability tensors arise instead of a simple diagonal tensor. A method is presented to calculate the permeability tensor for an unstructured gridblock to account for the small-scale heterogeneity information inside the gridblock. Single-phase flow-based upscaling is performed based on random boundary conditions and the effective tensor permeability is found through an optimization technique. Full, symmetric and diagonal permeability tensors are calculated for 2D and 3D blocks and sensitivity analysis is performed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.520
Threshold uncertainty score0.330

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it