MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044996410 · doi:10.1109/iemdc.2013.6556285

Development of a nonlinear loss minimization control of an IPMSM drive with flux estimation

2013· article· en· W2044996410 on OpenAlexaff
Bhavinkumar Patel, M. Nasir Uddin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSensorless Control of Electric Motors
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)StatorFlux linkageNonlinear systemMinificationVector controlComputer scienceLyapunov stabilityObserver (physics)Machine controlCopper lossControl engineeringEngineeringDirect torque controlInduction motorControl (management)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a nonlinear speed and loss minimization control (LMC) of an interior permanent magnet synchronous motor (IPMSM) drive to achieve both high efficiency and high dynamic performance. The control strategy is based on an input-output feedback linearization which ensures high performance speed control while minimizing the losses. Among all the losses, copper and iron losses can be precisely controlled and minimized by an optimal control of the d-axis stator current (id). The proposed LMC is developed based on motor model to produce optimum id for loss minimization. The global stability of the proposed drive system is verified through a Lyapunov's stability analysis. Also, a novel observer is applied to estimate the permanent magnet flux linkage (Ψ) online. The performance of the proposed nonlinear speed and LMC is demonstrated in simulation at different operating conditions. A performance comparison of the proposed LMC control scheme with the conventional control scheme is also provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSensorless Control of Electric MotorsFrench-language works237,207