MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045016786 · doi:10.1002/marc.200600380

Electronic Conductive Microporous Polymer‐Based Structures

2006· article· en· W2045016786 on OpenAlexafffund
Dinçer Yakisir, Frej Mighri, Mosto Bousmina

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Rapid Communications · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicConducting polymers and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceMicroporous materialCarbon blackComposite materialElectrical conductorGraphitePolymer blendPolymerPlastics extrusionRheologyExtrusionPolymer chemistryCopolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Summary: This study aims at developing a highly electronic conductive microporous structure from thermoplastic polymers filled with carbon black (CB) and graphite (GR). The matrix was a low viscosity poly(propylene) (PP) and the conductive additives were composed of high specific surface area CB and synthetic flake GR. Conductive blends were first developed using a corotating twin‐screw extruder. Rheological properties and conductivities of these blends were then characterized as a function of blend composition. Blends that show the best compromise between electronic conductivity and processability were subsequently extruded through a sheet die to obtain films of around 500 µm in thickness. These films were then stretched in two successive steps under controlled temperature and stretching rate to generate a film of controlled microporous structure. TEM of film made from a 50 wt.‐% PP/25 wt.‐% CB/25 wt.‐% GR blend after stretching. magnified image TEM of film made from a 50 wt.‐% PP/25 wt.‐% CB/25 wt.‐% GR blend after stretching.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromolecular Rapid CommunicationsSame topicConducting polymers and applicationsFrench-language works237,207