MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045020419 · doi:10.1109/haptics.2014.6775458

Passive shared virtual environment for distributed haptic cooperation

2014· article· en· W2045020419 on OpenAlexafffund
Ramtin Rakhsha, Daniela Constantinescu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTeleoperation and Haptic Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkNode (physics)Distributed computingInterconnectionNetwork topologyTopology (electrical circuits)Network architectureTransmission delayTelecommunications networkNetwork packetPassivityPort (circuit theory)EngineeringElectronic engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For distributed haptic cooperation systems, this paper develops a framework for virtual environments such that the design of the coordinating controllers is decoupled from the network topology and the communication issues. The discrete-time n-port passivity of the shared virtual object (SVO) is presented when n SVO copies are distributed on an undirected and connected communication topology with unreliable data transmission. Wave nodes as passive network elements can be implemented on multilateral wave-based communication architecture to passively distribute power across the network. In this note, the wave node scheme introduced in [16] is employed to construct a passive wave-based network architecture in order to passively interconnect multiple discrete-time port-Hamiltonian local SVO copies alongside their coordinating controllers. The performance analysis shows that the proposed network architecture: (i) possesses n-port passivity over a network with time-varying delay and packet-loss; (ii) is lossless when subjected to communications with no time delay; and (iii) offers less dissipation comparing to the network structures built based on the node scheme proposed in [18]. Simulations in which a VO is shared among four peers across a network with constant and varying time-delay validate the analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.986
Threshold uncertainty score0.446

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTeleoperation and Haptic SystemsFrench-language works237,207