Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Banquet offert à M. Alphonse Lemerre is a document associated with an event which took place at the Palais d’Orsay on the 24 January 1902 in order to celebrate the promotion of the publisher Lemerre to the rank of Officier in the Légion d’honneur. The document is printed with great care in order to display the taste and the art of the publishing house of Lemerre, known for its editions of contemporary poets (above all, the Parnassians), as well as the poets of the Pléiade. In addition, it reproduces the speeches and toasts given by Lemerre and his guests José-Maria de Heredia, André Theuriet and other poets. The analysis of the discourse proffered by Lemerre in his speech, as well as that of his guests, will help us to understand his role as publisher, which, under pressure by the opposition of symbolic and material values, became more and more contradictory as the century wore on. Above all, the article will show how the Banquet highlights the ambivalence at the heart of Lemerre’s posture as an artistic, honest and paternal publisher of poets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.049 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".