MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045033085 · doi:10.1159/000123064

Involvement of the Preoptic Region in Gonadotropin Release-Inhibition in Goldfish, Carassius auratus

2008· article· en· W2045033085 on OpenAlexafffund
Richard Peter, C. R. Paulencu

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroendocrinology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsInternal medicineEndocrinologyCarassius auratusPreoptic areaOvulationGonadotropinAnterior pituitaryGonadotropin-releasing hormonePituitary stalkBiologyHypothalamusPituitary glandDiencephalonHormoneLuteinizing hormoneMedicineFish <Actinopterygii>Fishery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lesions were made in various hypothalamic and preoptic regions in sexually mature female and male goldfish. Destruction of the pituitary stalk, and lateral anterior hypothalamic tract areas caused ovulation and increased serum gonadotropin levels. Destruction of the entire preoptic region or a major part of the anterior nucleus preopticus periventricularis also caused ovulation and increased serum GtH levels. Lesions in other locations were ineffective. The results indicate that a gonadotropin release-inhibitory factor (GRIF) probably originates in the anterior preoptic region, and reaches the pituitary via pathways in the lateral preoptic and lateral anterior hypothalamic regions, and the pituitary stalk. The preovulatory surge of gonadotropin secretion may be regulated by release from inhibition exerted by GRIF in goldfish.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations90
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroendocrinologySame topicReproductive biology and impacts on aquatic speciesFrench-language works237,207