MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045038733 · doi:10.9719/eeg.2011.44.6.503

Seismic Stratigraphy of Upper Devonian Carbonates Area in Northern Alberta, Canada

2011· article· en· W2045038733 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Minwoo Lee, Jinyong Oh, Hye-Su Yun

Bibliographic record

VenueEconomic and Environmental Geology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyUnconformityDevonianPaleontologySedimentary depositional environmentFaciesCretaceousSedimentary rockOnlapStratigraphyTectonicsStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

캐나다 북부 알버타주의 데본기 후기 Grosmont층은 중생대 백악기와 데본기 후기 사이 형성된 침식 부정합면 하부에 위치하며 Ireton층의 셰일에 의해 4개의 단위로 구분되고, 상향 천해화(shallowing-upward)를 보이는 전형적인 대륙붕 환경이다. Grosmont층은 탄성파의 극성, 연속성, 주파수/간격, 진폭 등의 해석요소를 고려하여 4개의 단위(LG, UG1, UG2, UG3)로 구분할 수 있었고 반사파는 중-고진폭, 중-저주파수의 특징을 보이고 반사면은 연속성이 좋으며 서로 평행한 형태로 나타났다. 시추공의 암상자료를 바탕으로 대륙붕 또는 플랫폼(platform) 환경으로 해석할 수 있지만 반사파의 특성이나 형태만으로 순차층의 경계면과 퇴적환경을 인지하기란 쉽지 않기 때문에 이 연구에서는 부순차층세트(parasequence set)로 하여 층서 해석을 시도하였다. 침식 부정합면에 의해 퇴적계 연합체와 함께 부순차층세트가 형성되는데, 침식부정합면은 암상자료와 탄성파상의 카르스트화작용 및 침식면에 의해 그 인지가 가능하였다. 연구지역에 분포하는 Grosmont 탄산염암층은 플랫폼 및 대륙붕 환경으로부터 분지 방향의 플랫폼 주변부을 향하면서 층후가 점차 감소하는 쐐기형태로 발달하며 전진하는 시그모이드-오블리크(sigmoid-oblique) 형태의 음향특성을 갖는 것이 특징적이며, 이는 해수면 변동과 연계되어 퇴적작용이 진행되었음을 지시해주고 있다. 퇴적단위의 대부분은 주로 해퇴 및 저해수면 환경 하에서 형성된 것으로 해석되어 플랫폼 환경을 뒷받침해주는 증거가 된다. 특히, 고해수면 환경 하에서 형성된 퇴적체 하부의 셰일층은 반복되는 해퇴기간 동안 대부분이 박층으로 분포하는 것으로 해석된다. The Upper Devonian Grosmont Formation in northern Alberta, Canada, underlies the erosion unconformity that formed between the Cretaceous and Upper Devonian. The formation is divided into four units on the basis of intercalated shales and showing a typical shelf environment of shallowing-upward. It was possible to separate four units(LG~UG3), considering the seismic interpretation attributes of polarity, continuity, frequency/spacing and amplitude and showing the reflection characteristics of the medium-high amplitude, medium-low frequency, good continuity, and subparallel reflection events. The formation can be interpreted as shelf or platform, based on in-situ core data. However, it is difficult, only with reflection attributes and features, to recognize the boundaries and sedimentary environment of parasequence. Therefore, we try to interprete by parasequence set in this study. The parasequence set was formed by erosion unconformity with systems tracts. The erosion unconformity can be recognized by facies data and karst, erosional surface. Grosmont carbonate deposits ranging from platform and shelf to shelf slope are; by wedge-shaped strata of characterized by complex sigmoid-oblique progradational configurations, reflecting a depositional history of upbuilding and outbuilding in response to sea-level changes. Most of the sedimentary units is interpreted as platforms under regression and lowstand environments that support is evidences. In particular, shale layer at the basal part of the highstand systems tracts represents the regressive to lowstand of sea level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.140
Teacher spread0.132 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEconomic and Environmental GeologySame topicGeological Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207