MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045047376 · doi:10.1142/s0218625x03004573

THEORY OF NONLINEAR GUIDED AND SURFACE PLASMON–POLARITONS IN DIELECTRIC FILMS

2003· article· en· W2045047376 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSurface Review and Letters · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNonlinear Optical Materials Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSurface plasmon polaritonPolaritonDielectricPlasmonCondensed matter physicsIsotropyPolarization (electrochemistry)Surface plasmonSemiconductorMaterials scienceNonlinear systemElectronDispersion relationOpticsPhysicsOptoelectronicsChemistryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Calculations are presented for the dispersion relations of nonlinear plasmon–polariton modes in a layered dielectric structure consisting of a film bounded on each side by another medium. At least one of the media is a metal or semiconductor (such as InSb) with a real, isotropic, frequency-dependent dielectric function, characteristic of an electron plasma. In addition, both media may have a Kerr-type nonlinearity in their dielectric functions. Hence the resulting plasmon–polaritons, which we study in s polarization, are nonlinear and are found to occur in multiple branches. The theory is illustrated by numerical solutions of the dispersion relations for several geometries and physical parameters, and a comparison is made with previous plasmon–polariton results for linear dielectric media as a special case.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.248
Threshold uncertainty score0.554

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it