MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045047376 · doi:10.1142/s0218625x03004573

THEORY OF NONLINEAR GUIDED AND SURFACE PLASMON–POLARITONS IN DIELECTRIC FILMS

2003· article· en· W2045047376 on OpenAlexafffund
S. Baher, M. G. Cottam

Bibliographic record

VenueSurface Review and Letters · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNonlinear Optical Materials Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSurface plasmon polaritonPolaritonDielectricPlasmonCondensed matter physicsIsotropyPolarization (electrochemistry)Surface plasmonSemiconductorMaterials scienceNonlinear systemElectronDispersion relationOpticsPhysicsOptoelectronicsChemistryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Calculations are presented for the dispersion relations of nonlinear plasmon–polariton modes in a layered dielectric structure consisting of a film bounded on each side by another medium. At least one of the media is a metal or semiconductor (such as InSb) with a real, isotropic, frequency-dependent dielectric function, characteristic of an electron plasma. In addition, both media may have a Kerr-type nonlinearity in their dielectric functions. Hence the resulting plasmon–polaritons, which we study in s polarization, are nonlinear and are found to occur in multiple branches. The theory is illustrated by numerical solutions of the dispersion relations for several geometries and physical parameters, and a comparison is made with previous plasmon–polariton results for linear dielectric media as a special case.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSurface Review and LettersSame topicNonlinear Optical Materials StudiesFrench-language works237,207