Gross Morphological Changes of the Spinal Cord Immediately After Surgical Decompression in a Large Animal Model of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Quantitative in vivo ultrasound imaging study of spinal cord and dura morphology after acute experimental spinal cord injury (SCI) and decompression in a pig model. OBJECTIVE: To study the morphological changes of the spinal cord and dura immediately after surgical decompression for acute SCI. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Surgical decompression for traumatic SCI is currently a topic of debate. After decompression, relief of bony impingement on the thecal sac and spinal cord can be confirmed intraoperatively. However, postoperative imaging often reveals that the cord has swollen to fill the subarachnoid space. Little is known about the extent and timing of this morphological response. METHODS: Yucatan miniature pigs received sham surgery (N = 1) or a moderate (N = 6, 20 g, 2.3 m/s) or high (N = 6, 20 g, 4.7 m/s) severity weight-drop SCI followed by 8 hours of sustained compression (100 g) and 6 hours of postdecompression monitoring. Sagittal-plane ultrasound images were used to quantify spinal cord, dura, and subarachnoid space dimensions preinjury and once per hour after decompression. RESULTS: Animals with a moderate SCI exhibited a residual cord deformation of up to 0.64 mm within 10 minutes of decompression, which tended to resolve during 6 hours because of tissue relaxation and swelling. For animals with high-severity SCIs, cord swelling was immediate and resulted in occlusion of the subarachnoid space within 10 minutes to 5 hours, whereas this occurred for only half of the moderate injury group. CONCLUSION: Decompression of an acute SCI may result in residual cord deformation followed by gradual swelling or immediate swelling leading to subarachnoid occlusion. The response is dependent on initial injury severity. These observations may partly explain the lack of benefit of decompression in some patients and suggest a need to reduce cord swelling to optimize the clinical outcome after acute SCI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".