A lacustrine shoreface succession in the Albert Formation, Moncton Basin, New Brunswick
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Research Article| December 01, 2008 A lacustrine shoreface succession in the Albert Formation, Moncton Basin, New Brunswick Dave Keighley Dave Keighley Department of Geology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB E3B 5A3, keig@unb.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Dave Keighley Department of Geology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB E3B 5A3, keig@unb.ca Publisher: Canadian Energy Geoscience Association Received: 31 May 2007 Accepted: 10 Nov 2008 First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 2368-0261 Print ISSN: 0007-4802 © The Society of Canadian Petroleum Geologists Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (2008) 56 (4): 235–258. https://doi.org/10.2113/gscpgbull.56.4.235 Article history Received: 31 May 2007 Accepted: 10 Nov 2008 First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Permissions Search Site Citation Dave Keighley; A lacustrine shoreface succession in the Albert Formation, Moncton Basin, New Brunswick. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology 2008;; 56 (4): 235–258. doi: https://doi.org/10.2113/gscpgbull.56.4.235 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyBulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology Search Advanced Search Abstract The Albert Formation (Horton Group) of the Moncton Basin, New Brunswick, is host to the only onshore petroleum system in the Maritime Provinces from which oil and natural gas are commercially produced. Production from the McCully gas field is from tight reservoir sandstone in the upper part of the Albert Formation. An outcrop analogue is herein identified on the basis of a comparison of subsurface and surface gamma ray logs. The analogue is exposed in four roadcuts 15 km to the west of the field, between Sussex and Norton. The succession in the roadcuts is about 60 m thick and can be divided into three, roughly 20 m thick units: a lower interbedded grey mudstone and sandstone interval, a medial organic rich grey mudstone interval, and an upper interbedded grey sandstone and mudstone interval. The lower interval is interpreted as having been deposited in a lacustrine offshore transition and lower shoreface setting. The overlying medial interval is interpreted as offshore, with the upper interval assigned to a lacustrine shoreface and shoreline (with some fluvial, possibly deltaic influence). The lower and upper interbedded sandstone intervals are viewed as progradational sediment packages deposited during times of stable lake level whereas the intervening mudstone-dominated medial interval represents a period of renewed lake deepening. On a larger scale, the entire succession is considered part of the final progradation of an axial fluvio-deltaic system into the Albert lake. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".