MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045060862 · doi:10.1210/me.2004-0425

Bone Morphogenic Protein (Smad)-Mediated Repression of Proopiomelanocortin Transcription by Interference with Pitx/Tpit Activity

2005· article· en· W2045060862 on OpenAlexaff
Maria Nudi, Jean‐François Ouimette, Jacques Drouin

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Endocrinology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicTGF-β signaling in diseases
Canadian institutionsMontreal Clinical Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyPsychological repressionSMADAutocrine signallingTranscription factorSignal transductionCell biologyBone morphogenetic proteinRegulation of gene expressionProopiomelanocortinGene expressionReceptorGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The signaling molecules bone morphogenic protein (BMP) 4 and 2 have been implicated in early organogenesis and cell differentiation of the pituitary. However, the use of different experimental paradigms has led to conflicting interpretations with regard to the action of these factors on differentiation of corticotroph cells and on expression of the proopiomelanocortin (POMC) gene. We have now directly assessed the action of BMP signaling on POMC expression and found that BMP4 represses POMC mRNA levels and promoter activity. This repression appears to be dependent on the classical BMP signaling pathway that involves the activin-like kinase 3/6 receptors and the Smad1/4 transcription factors. The repression is reversed by overexpression of the inhibitory Smads, Smad6 or Smad7. Collectively, the evidence suggests that autocrine BMP signaling may be acting upon AtT-20 cells to set the level of POMC expression. Upon BMP4 stimulation, activated phospho-Smad1 is recruited to the POMC promoter, where it apparently acts through interactions with the Pitx and Tpit transcription factors. It is postulated that these interactions interfere with the transcriptional activity of Pitx and/or Tpit, thus resulting in transcriptional repression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.963

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations60
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular EndocrinologySame topicTGF-β signaling in diseasesFrench-language works237,207