Self-talk and emotional intelligence in university students.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette etude avait pour but d'examiner le monologue interieur, l'annee d'etude et le sexe en tant que variables explicatives du quotient emotionnel, aupres d'un echantillon de 126 etudiants universitaires de premier cycle (42 hommes, 84 femmes). La litterature scientifique considere que le monologue interieur a pour fonction d'ameliorer la conscience de soi et la maitrise de soi, qui sont tous deux consideres comme des facteurs importants dans le construit du quotient emotionnel. Les participants ont rempli des questionnaires auto-rapportes sur le monologue interieur et le quotient emotionnel. Les resultats indiquent que l'annee d'etude et le monologue interieur constituent des variables predictives significatives du quotient emotionnel et qu'elles sont associees positivement au quotient emotionnel. Contrairement aux attentes, le sexe des participants ne s'est pas revele comme predicteur significatif. Ces resultats sont discutes en termes de potentialites pour la recherche future sur l'etude du monologue interieur et du quotient emotionnel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it