MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045069106 · doi:10.1109/lsp.2010.2097590

Mean Square Error Estimation in Thresholding

2010· article· en· W2045069106 on OpenAlexaff
Soosan Beheshti, Masoud Hashemi, Ervin Sejdić, Tom Chau

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Signal Processing Letters · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsHolland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation HospitalUniversity of TorontoToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMean squared errorThresholdingComputer scienceProbabilistic logicAlgorithmMathematicsStatisticsMean squarePattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a novel approach to estimating the mean square error (MSE) associated with any given threshold level in both hard and soft thresholding. The estimate is provided by using only the data that is being thresholded. This adaptive approach provides probabilistic confidence bounds on the MSE. The MSE bounds can be used to evaluate the denoising method. Our simulation results confirm that not only does the method provide an accurate estimate of the MSE for any given thresohlding method, but the proposed method can also search and find an optimum threshold for any noisy data with regard to MSE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Signal Processing LettersSame topicImage and Signal Denoising MethodsFrench-language works237,207