MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2045092603 · doi:10.1109/isbi.2012.6235604

Diffusion tensor image processing using biquaternions

2012· article· en· W2045092603 on OpenAlexaff
K. Krishna Nand, Ghassan Hamarneh, Rafeef Abugharbieh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvolution (computer science)Diffusion MRIFourier transformImage processingComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceTensor (intrinsic definition)QuaternionComputer visionAlgorithmPattern recognition (psychology)MathematicsImage (mathematics)Mathematical analysisMagnetic resonance imagingGeometryArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a biquaternion formalism to model diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging (DT-MRI) data. Unlike previous methods that use dimensionality reduction, we are able to process the full tensor in a holistic manner while respecting the underlying manifold of the data. Using this approach, we introduce the Fourier transform and convolution for DT-MRI for the first time, which can be applied directly on the full tensor. This opens up a wide range of applications for DT-MRI image processing. Further, based on this formulation, we present a biquaternion gradient vector and edge detector for DT images. Preliminary results of applying the Fourier transform, convolution and edge detector on synthetic examples as well as real DT data show great promise in our approach for DT image processing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications→French-language works237,207→