MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045092946 · doi:10.4314/sinet.v23i2.18171

<b>Review Article</b><br><br> Free-living limnic nemafauna of Ethiopia: a review of the species reported outside the Rift Valley

2000· review· en· W2045092946 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eyualem Abebe

Bibliographic record

VenueSINET Ethiopian Journal of Science · 2000
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine Biology and Ecology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRift valleyDominance (genetics)GeographyQuarter (Canadian coin)EcologyRiftBiologyArchaeologyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The available information on free-living limnic nematodes from Ethiopia is reviewed with special emphasis on those reported outside the Rift Valley, for which species are listed with their corresponding sites of occurrence. The families Monhysteridae, Dorylaimidae, and Tobrilidae comprise more than half of the total of 91 species hitherto reported from Ethiopia. Among 69 species reported outside the Rift Valley, a similar trend of dominance is observed. Of these, about a quarter of the species have never been reported out of their corresponding type localities (in Ethiopia). Most of the remaining are either cosmopolitan or have been reported earlier from Africa. The occurrence of the fifteen most widely distributed species is shown on maps. Brevitobrilus graciloides is the most widely distributed species. Studies on abundance and diversity, though limited, are also included. SINET: Ethiopian Journal of Science Vol. 23, No. 2 (December 2000), pp. 273-291 Key words/phrases: Aquatic nematofauna, free-living nematodes, inland water bodies

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSINET Ethiopian Journal of ScienceSame topicMarine Biology and Ecology ResearchFrench-language works237,207