Fonction réflexive parentale et trouble réactionnel de l'attachement : perspectives théoriques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La théorie de la fonction réflexive (FR), qui a pris de l’ampleur dans la littérature scientifique au cours des quinze dernières années, offre un cadre conceptuel pertinent au travail clinique avec les enfants souffrant du trouble réactionnel de l’attachement (TRA) et leurs parents. À travers une revue critique de la littérature scientifique sur le sujet, les rapports entre la FR et le TRA sont explorés et nuancés en lien avec les manifestions cliniques du trouble. Deux aspects des premières relations soignantes, soit la prévisibilité et la contingence, sont mis en avant comme ayant un impact déterminant sur le développement chez l’enfant d’une fonction réflexive non-défensive et d’un sentiment de sécurité dans la relation d’attachement parent-enfant. Chez la mère, la persistance des modes de fonctionnement réflexif pré-mentalisant – les modes équivalent et fictif – pourrait expliquer l’émergence chez l’enfant de certains ensembles de symptômes associés au TRA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.025 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".