Combined Functional MRI and Diffusion Tensor Imaging Analysis of Visual Motion Pathways
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Motion perception may be preserved after damage to striate cortex (primary visual cortex, area V1). Awareness and normal discrimination of fast-moving stimuli have been observed even in the complete absence of V1. These facts suggest that motion-sensitive cortex (the V5/MT complex or V5/MT+) may be activated by direct thalamic or collicular inputs that bypass V1. Such projections have been identified previously in monkeys but have not been shown in humans using neuroimaging techniques. METHODS: We used diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) tractography to visualize white matter fiber tracts connecting with V5/MT+ in 10 healthy volunteers. V5/MT+ was localized for each subject using functional MRI (fMRI). Functional activity maps were overlaid on high-resolution anatomical images and registered with the diffusion-weighted images to define V5/MT+ as the region of interest (ROI) for DTI tractography analysis. Fibers connecting to V1 were excluded from the analysis. RESULTS: Using conservative tractography parameters, we found connections between the V5/MT+ region and the posterior thalamus and/or superior colliculus in 4 of 10 subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Connections between the V5/MT+ region and the posterior thalamus and/or superior colliculus may explain visual motion awareness in the absence of a functioning V1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".