MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045152257 · doi:10.3917/rsi.096.0041

L'expérience de l'incertitude chez les pères et les mères dans le processus de l'annonce de la déficience motrice cérébrale de leur enfant

2009· article· fr· W2045152257 on OpenAlexaff
Diane Pelchat, Valérie Bourgeois-Guérin

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherche en soins infirmiers · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicFamily and Disability Support Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalUniversité de MontréalCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette étude qualitative illustre les différences et les similitudes entre l’expérience de l’incertitude des pères et des mères lors de l’annonce de la déficience motrice cérébrale (DMC) et des stratégies d’adaptation mises en place. Des entrevues ont été conduites avec 17 parents (10 mères et 7 pères). Les résultats révèlent trois déclencheurs d’incertitude principaux : l’incertitude relative à la survie de l’enfant, l’imprévisibilité de l’évolution de l’enfant et l’ambiguïté de l’information sur la DMC. Les déclencheurs d’incertitude sont les mêmes pour les deux parents, mais leur façon de réagir aux déclencheurs et les choix des stratégies d’adaptation diffèrent chez les deux parents. Des recommandations cliniques sont présentées.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.148
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.145
GPT teacher head0.466
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherche en soins infirmiersSame topicFamily and Disability Support ResearchFrench-language works237,207