Serotonin Facilitates a Persistent Calcium Current in Motoneurons of Rats With and Without Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the months after spinal cord transection, motoneurons in the rat spinal cord develop large persistent inward currents (PICs) that are responsible for muscle spasticity. These PICs are mediated by low-threshold TTX-sensitive sodium currents (Na PIC) and L-type calcium currents (Ca PIC). Recently, the Na PIC was shown to become supersensitive to serotonin (5-HT) after chronic injury. In the present paper, a similar change in the sensitivity of the Ca PIC to 5-HT was investigated after injury. The whole sacrocaudal spinal cord from acute spinal rats and spastic chronic spinal rats (S2 level transection 2 mo previously) was studied in vitro. Intracellular recordings were made from motoneurons and slow voltages ramps were applied to measure PICs. TTX was used to block the Na PIC. For motoneurons of chronic spinal rats, a low dose of 5-HT (1 microM) significantly lowered the threshold of the Ca PIC from -56.7 +/- 6.0 to -63.1 +/- 7.1 mV and increased the amplitude of the Ca PIC from 2.4 +/- 1.0 to 3.0 +/- 0.73 nA. Higher doses of 5-HT acted similarly. For motoneurons of acute spinal rats, low doses of 5-HT had no significant effects, whereas a high dose (about 30 microM) significantly lowered the threshold of the L-Ca PIC from -58.5 +/- 14.8 to -62.5 +/- 3.6 mV and increased the amplitude of the Ca PIC from 0.69 +/- 1.05 to 1.27 +/- 1.1 nA. Thus Ca PICs in motoneurons are about 30-fold supersensitive to 5-HT in chronic spinal rats. The 5-HT-induced facilitation of the Ca PIC was blocked by nimodipine, not by the I(h) current blocker Cs(+) (3 mM) or the SK current blocker apamin (0.15 microM), and it lasted for hours after the removal of 5-HT from the nCSF, even increasing initially after removing 5-HT. The effects of 5-HT make motoneurons more excitable and ultimately lead to larger, more easily activated plateaus and self-sustained firing. The supersensitivity to 5-HT suggests the small amounts of endogenous 5-HT below the injury in a chronic spinal rat may act on supersensitive receptors to produce large Ca PICs and ultimately enable muscle spasms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".