MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045222312 · doi:10.1167/12.9.117

Revealing the face behind the mask: Emergent unconscious perception in object substitution masking

2012· article· en· W2045222312 on OpenAlexaff
Stephanie C. Goodhew, Susanne Ferber, S. Qian, David Chan, Jay Pratt

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vision · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFace Recognition and Perception
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerceptionUnconscious mindPriming (agriculture)PsychologyFace (sociological concept)Computer scienceCognitive psychologyCommunicationComputer visionArtificial intelligenceSpeech recognitionNeuroscienceLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human visual awareness is inherently limited. We are conscious of only a small fraction of the available information at a given point in time. Given this limitation, vision scientists have long been fascinated with the depth of processing that occurs outside of awareness, and have thus developed a number of tools for rendering stimuli unconscious, including object substitution masking (OSM). In OSM, perception of a briefly-presented target image is impaired by a sparse common-onsetting, temporally-trailing mask. To what level are successfully masked targets processed? Existing evidence suggests that OSM disrupts face perception. That is, the N170, an ERP waveform that reflects face processing, was obliterated by the delayed offset of the mask (Reiss & Hoffman, 2007). Here, however, we found the first evidence for implicit face processing in OSM. Participants were presented with an OSM array that had either a face or a house target image, followed by a target string of letters that required a speeded lexical decision. Participants then identified the target image from the OSM array. On trials in which the target image was masked and not perceived, we found priming, such that responses to the target word were facilitated when the meaning of the word was compatible with the preceding image, compared with when it was incompatible. That is, the category to which the target object belonged (face, house) systematically influenced participants’ performance of another task. This reveals that there is indeed implicit face perception in OSM. Interestingly, this priming occurred only when participants were unaware of the target. The fact that priming was specific to trials where the target was not perceived demonstrates a qualitative distinction between conscious and unconscious perception. This implies that unconscious perception is more sophisticated than a merely impoverished version of conscious recognition. Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2012

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of VisionSame topicFace Recognition and PerceptionFrench-language works237,207