MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045230234 · doi:10.1680/jadcr.14.00048

Drying of calcium-silicate-hydrates: regeneration of elastic modulus

2015· article· en· W2045230234 on OpenAlexaff
P. Pourbeik, J.J. Beaudoin, Rouhollah Alizadeh, Laïla Raki

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Cement Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicConcrete and Cement Materials Research
Canadian institutionsGiatec Scientific (Canada)National Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTobermoriteCalcium silicate hydrateCalcium silicateDynamic mechanical analysisMaterials scienceSilicatePortland cementThermal analysisElastic modulusComposite materialCementDynamic modulusCalciumHydrateMineralogyThermalChemical engineeringChemistryMetallurgyThermodynamicsPolymerOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA) measurements for layered calcium silicate systems (1·4 nm tobermorite, jennite, synthetic calcium-silicate-hydrate and hydrated Portland cement paste) are reported. Elastic modulus results were obtained for samples initially conditioned to 11% relative humidity (RH) and dried during the DMTA test and for samples subjected to prolonged vacuum and thermal drying prior to a DMTA test. Decreases in elastic modulus relative to the 11% RH starting condition typically observed during a DMTA test were recovered subsequent to the prolonged thermal treatment. A possible ‘regeneration' mechanism for the elastic modulus is discussed. The ‘regeneration' occurs for all the calcium silicate systems studied. The results are consistent with the notions expressed for nanostructural models of calcium-silicate-hydrate in cement paste that comprise structural units based on 1·4 nm tobermorite and jennite.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.359

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Cement ResearchSame topicConcrete and Cement Materials ResearchFrench-language works237,207