Intermediate Release by ADP-<scp>l</scp>-<i>glycero</i>-<scp>d</scp>-<i>manno</i>-heptose 6-Epimerase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ADP-l-glycero-d-manno-heptose 6-epimerase (HldD or AGME, formerly RfaD) catalyzes the interconversion of ADP-beta-d-glycero-d-manno-heptose (ADP-d,d-Hep) and ADP-beta-l-glycero-d-manno-heptose (ADP-l,d-Hep). The latter compound provides the heptose moiety that is used in lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis by Gram-negative bacteria. Several lines of evidence suggest that the enzyme uses a direct oxidation/reduction mechanism involving a tightly bound NADP+ cofactor. An initial oxidation at C-6'' gives a 6''-keto intermediate, and a subsequent reduction on the opposite face of the carbonyl group generates the epimeric product. The reorientation required for the nonstereoselective reduction could take place within a single active site, or it could involve the release of the intermediate and rebinding in an altered conformation. To distinguish between these possibilities, two isotopically labeled substrates (ADP-d,d-Hep) were prepared that contained 18O and 2H isotopes at C-7'' and C-6'', respectively. A crossover experiment was used to determine whether unlabeled or doubly labeled products were formed upon epimerization of a mixture of the two singly labeled compounds. After an initial epimeric equilibrium was reached, no crossover could be detected, indicating that intermediate release is not intrinsic to the overall mechanism. After extended incubation, however, scrambling of the labels could be detected, indicating that a low background rate of intermediate release does occur. To directly detect the release of the intermediate, the labeled compounds were independently epimerized in the presence of a ketone-trapping reagent, phenylhydrazine. The corresponding phenylhydrazones were identified by mass spectrometry, and the absence of any 2H isotope in the adduct obtained from the deuterated starting compound confirmed that the oxidation had occurred at C-6''.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".