MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045299216 · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.1466

613 IMMEDIATE, COMPARED TO DEFERRED, COMBINED ANDROGEN BLOCKADE PROLONGS TIME TO CASTRATE-RESISTANT LNCAP PROSTATE CANCER PROGRESSION <i>IN VIVO</i>

2011· article· en· W2045299216 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hidetoshi Kuruma, Kilian M. Gust, Hiroaki Matsumoto, Amina Zoubeidi, C. Thomas, François Lamoureux, Martin Gleave

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Urology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLNCaPMedicineProstate cancerBicalutamideCastrationAndrogenBlockadeAndrogen deprivation therapyCancerInternal medicineOncologyAndrogen receptorHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Basic Research1 Apr 2011613 IMMEDIATE, COMPARED TO DEFERRED, COMBINED ANDROGEN BLOCKADE PROLONGS TIME TO CASTRATE-RESISTANT LNCAP PROSTATE CANCER PROGRESSION IN VIVO Hidetoshi Kuruma, Kilian Gust, Hiroaki Matsumoto, Amina Zoubeidi, Chirstian Thomas, Francois Lamoureux, and Martin Gleave Hidetoshi KurumaHidetoshi Kuruma Vancouver, Canada More articles by this author , Kilian GustKilian Gust Vancouver, Canada More articles by this author , Hiroaki MatsumotoHiroaki Matsumoto Vancouver, Canada More articles by this author , Amina ZoubeidiAmina Zoubeidi Vancouver, Canada More articles by this author , Chirstian ThomasChirstian Thomas Vancouver, Canada More articles by this author , Francois LamoureuxFrancois Lamoureux Vancouver, Canada More articles by this author , and Martin GleaveMartin Gleave Vancouver, Canada More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.1466AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Androgen deprivation therapy is standard for advanced prostate cancer (PCa). Combined androgen blockade (CAB) refers to surgical or medical castration plus an anti-androgen is considered maximum androgen blockade therapy. However, there is no consensus about optimal timing of anti-androgen induction after castration. In this study, we compared effects of immediate vs. delayed administration of bicalutamide after castration on time to castrate-resistant LNCaP tumor growth. METHODS Androgen dependent human prostate cancer LNCaP cells were inoculated into male athymic nude mice subcutaneously. Serum PSA level and tumour volumes were followed weekly. When serum PSA values reached 50ng/ml, mice were castrated and divided into 3 groups including immediate CAB, CAB after progression to castration resistance (deferred CAB), or vehicle-only dosing. 50mg/kg of bicalutamide was used as an anti- androgen. RESULTS Forty one mice entered this study. Averages of PSA and tumour volume were similar prior to castration in all three groups. In the immediate CAB group, PSA declined to −91.2% from baseline 2 weeks after CAB, compared to −64.6% for vehicle. In the deferred CAB group, PSA declined −50.4% by 1W after castration, and returned to pre-castration levels at 4 weeks. By 12 weeks post-castration, PSA levels were −29.0%, +197.0% and +118.1% from baseline for the immediate CAB, deferred CAB and vehicle groups, respectively. PSA levels in the immediate CAB group were significantly lower than deferred CAB (p=0.04 at 12 weeks). Tumor volume in the immediate CAB group decreased −10.2% at 2 weeks after CAB, while tumor volume in the deferred CAB and vehicle-only groups continued to increase post-castration. By 12 weeks after castration, tumor volume increased by +98.2%, +307.4% and +546.9% from base line for immediate CAB, deferred CAB and vehicle groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Immediate CAB, at time of first-line castration, prolonged time to recurrence compared deferred CAB in the androgen-sensitive LNCaP models, and has ongoing implications to the clinical disease as more potent anti-androgens are under development. © 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 185Issue 4SApril 2011Page: e247 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Hidetoshi Kuruma Vancouver, Canada More articles by this author Kilian Gust Vancouver, Canada More articles by this author Hiroaki Matsumoto Vancouver, Canada More articles by this author Amina Zoubeidi Vancouver, Canada More articles by this author Chirstian Thomas Vancouver, Canada More articles by this author Francois Lamoureux Vancouver, Canada More articles by this author Martin Gleave Vancouver, Canada More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.088

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of UrologySame topicProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207