Visual pigments and dichroism of anchovy cones: A model system for polarization detection.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The retinas of anchovies have two unique photoreceptor types: "bifid" and "long" cones (Fineran & Nicol, 1976). The outer segments of these cells contain multiple layers of membranes (lamellae) oriented longitudinally (axially). This orientation is distinct from that in all other vertebrate rods and cones, where the lamellae are stacked transversely with their planes perpendicular to the incident light path. Although the common arrangement provides optimal absorption for normally incident light rays, it is also insensitive to the rays' direction of vibration (i.e. their polarization). In contrast, the two mutually perpendicular sets of axially oriented lamellae segregated into bifid and long cones could function as the principal analyzers for linearly polarized light, as previously hypothesized (Fineran & Nicol, 1976, 1978). Here, we report on a microspectrophotometric study that shows (1) the presence of two spectrally distinct visual pigments in the three photoreceptor types of the bay anchovy retina; these are typical vertebrate pigments in that they bleach, when exposed to light, and have absorption spectra like all other vitamin A1-based visual pigments; (2) that the rods and cones exhibit dichroic absorption of light in accordance with their lamellar orientation, and (3) that the two cone types of the retina contain a spectrally indistinguishable pigment with peak absorbance (lambda(max)) around 540 nm, while the rods contain a rhodopsin-like pigment with lambda(max) near 500 nm. Compared to other vertebrates, anchovies are remarkable for using a monochromatic cone system with unusual specializations supportive of a polarization detection system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it