MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045307412 · doi:10.1017/s1053837200007045

John P. Cochran and Fred R. Glahe, The Hayek-Keynes Debate: Lessons for Current Business Cycle Research (Lewiston, Queenston and Lampeter: The Edwin Mellen Press, 1999), pp. xiv, 221, $89.95. ISBN 0 7734 7970 8.

2001· article· en· W2045307412 on OpenAlexaff
Gilles Dostaler

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the History of Economic Thought · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Theory and Institutions
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusiness cycleCurrent (fluid)EconomicsEconomic historyLaw and economicsPhilosophyKeynesian economicsThermodynamicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

John P. Cochran and Fred R. Glahe, The Hayek-Keynes Debate: Lessons for Current Business Cycle Research (Lewiston, Queenston and Lampeter: The Edwin Mellen Press, 1999), pp. xiv, 221, $89.95. ISBN 0 7734 7970 8. - Volume 23 Issue 3

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.146

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.010
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0440.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the History of Economic ThoughtSame topicEconomic Theory and InstitutionsFrench-language works237,207