MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Precise Extraction of the Induced Polarization in the<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>He</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>Reaction

2011· article· lv· W2045347167 on OpenAlex
S. Malace, M. Paolone, S. Strauch, I. Albayrak, J. Arrington, B. L. Berman, E. J. Brash, W. J. Briscoe, A. Camsonne, Jyh‐Ping Chen, M. E. Christy, E. Chudakov, E. Cisbani, B. Craver, F. Cusanno, R. Ent, F. Garibaldi, R. Gilman, A. Glamazdin, J. Glister, D. W. Higinbotham, C. E. Hyde-Wright, Y. Ilieva, C. W. de Jager, X. Jiang, M. Jones, C. Keppel, E. Khrosinkova, G. Kumbartzki, B. Lee, R. Lindgren, D. J. Margaziotis, D. Meekins, R. Michaels, K. Park, L. Pentchev, C. F. Perdrisat, E. Piasetzky, Vina Punjabi, A. J. R. Puckett, X. Qian, Y. Qiang, R. D. Ransome, A. Saha, A. Sarty, Eva C. Schulte, P. Solvignon, R. Subedi, L. Tang, D. J. Tedeschi, V. Tvaskis, J. M. Udı́as, P. E. Ulmer, J. R. Vignote, F. R. Wesselmann, B. Wojtsekhowski, X. Zhan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2011
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamics
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's UniversityDalhousie University
FundersU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We measured with unprecedented precision the induced polarization ${P}_{y}$ in $^{4}\mathrm{He}(e,{e}^{\ensuremath{'}}\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{p})^{3}\mathrm{H}$ at ${Q}^{2}=0.8$ and $1.3\text{ }\text{ }(\mathrm{GeV}/c{)}^{2}$. The induced polarization is indicative of reaction-mechanism effects beyond the impulse approximation. Our results are in agreement with a relativistic distorted-wave impulse approximation calculation but are overestimated by a calculation with strong charge-exchange effects. Our data are used to constrain the strength of the spin-independent charge-exchange term in the latter calculation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.819
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.010
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.010
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0070.007
Scholarly communication0.0070.009
Open science0.0120.009
Research integrity0.0080.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0710.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it