MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045351714 · doi:10.1002/ett.2530

Distribution of the uplink multipaths’ arrival delay and azimuth‐elevation arrival angle because of ‘bad urban’ scatterers distributed cylindrically above the mobile

2012· article· en· W2045351714 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
Canadian institutionsEastern Ontario Training Board
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAzimuthElevation (ballistics)Telecommunications linkAngle of arrivalBase stationGeodesyMobile stationElevation angleDirection of arrivalComputer scienceGeologyTelecommunicationsGeometryAntenna (radio)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT For radiowave landmobile cellular wireless communication in ‘bad urban’ environments dominated by high rises, this paper analytically derives closed‐form expressions for the trivariate and bivariate joint distributions of the time‐of‐arrival and two‐dimensional azimuth‐elevation direction‐of‐arrival of the uplink multipaths. These expressions are explicitly in terms of the parameters of a ‘geometrical’ model of the three‐dimensional spatial relationships among the mobile station, the scatterers and the base station. This present ‘geometric model’ idealises the scatterers as uniformly located within the volume of a three‐dimensional vertical above‐ground cylinder whose flat bottom circular base centres at the mobile. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.530
Threshold uncertainty score0.575

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it