MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045375986 · doi:10.1080/00150193.2012.684983

Bent-Core and Nematic Liquid Crystal Functionalized Gold Nanorods

2012· article· en· W2045375986 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueFerroelectrics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLiquid Crystal Research Advancements
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanorodLiquid crystalMaterials scienceBromideChemical engineeringNanotechnologyTransmission electron microscopyPulmonary surfactantOrganic chemistryOptoelectronicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Gold nanorods (GNRs) functionalized with trimethoxysilane terminated nematic or bent-core liquid crystals (LCs) are described. In the first step, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) surfactant-stabilized GNRs were prepared using a single step, non-seeding method. The CTAB capping on the GNRs was then replaced in a two-step process first by binding of mercaptopropyltrimethoxysilane followed by immobilization of the nematic or bent-core LC silane by a dehydration condensation. The final LC-decorated GNRs were characterized by UV-vis-NIR spectrophotometry, IR spectroscopy and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The functionalized nanorods were found to be stable, well dispersible in non-polar organic solvents. The bent-core LC-capped GNRs exhibited only short-range self-assembly after slow evaporation of the solvent on TEM grids. However, the nematic LC-decorated rods displayed regular patterns of self-assembled GNRs on TEM grids after annealing the sample in the presence of an external magnetic field. Keywords: Bent-core liquid crystalnematicgold nanorodsself-assembly Acknowledgments This work was financially supported by the Province of Manitoba, the NSF through a Center for Chemical Innovation, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada, the Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI), the Manitoba Research and Innovation Fund (MRIF). We would also like to thank Andre Dufresne for assistance with TEM imaging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.433
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it