MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045375986 · doi:10.1080/00150193.2012.684983

Bent-Core and Nematic Liquid Crystal Functionalized Gold Nanorods

2012· article· en· W2045375986 on OpenAlexaffabout
S. Umadevi, Xiaomiao Feng, Torsten Hegmann

Bibliographic record

VenueFerroelectrics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLiquid Crystal Research Advancements
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanorodLiquid crystalMaterials scienceBromideChemical engineeringNanotechnologyTransmission electron microscopyPulmonary surfactantOrganic chemistryOptoelectronicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gold nanorods (GNRs) functionalized with trimethoxysilane terminated nematic or bent-core liquid crystals (LCs) are described. In the first step, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) surfactant-stabilized GNRs were prepared using a single step, non-seeding method. The CTAB capping on the GNRs was then replaced in a two-step process first by binding of mercaptopropyltrimethoxysilane followed by immobilization of the nematic or bent-core LC silane by a dehydration condensation. The final LC-decorated GNRs were characterized by UV-vis-NIR spectrophotometry, IR spectroscopy and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The functionalized nanorods were found to be stable, well dispersible in non-polar organic solvents. The bent-core LC-capped GNRs exhibited only short-range self-assembly after slow evaporation of the solvent on TEM grids. However, the nematic LC-decorated rods displayed regular patterns of self-assembled GNRs on TEM grids after annealing the sample in the presence of an external magnetic field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFerroelectricsSame topicLiquid Crystal Research AdvancementsFrench-language works237,207