The Role of Professional Expertise in Evidence-Based Occupational Therapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Research Article| Online September 01 2003 The Role of Professional Expertise in Evidence-Based Occupational Therapy Susan Rappolt Susan Rappolt Susan Rappolt, PhD, OT Reg (Ont), is Associate Professor, Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, 500 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1V7; s.rappolt@utoronto.ca Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Author & Article Information Online ISSN: 1943-7676 Print ISSN: 0272-9490 Copyright © 2003 by the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc.2003 The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 2003, Vol. 57(5), 589–593. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.57.5.589 Connected Content A correction has been published: Correction Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Susan Rappolt; The Role of Professional Expertise in Evidence-Based Occupational Therapy. Am J Occup Ther September/October 2003, Vol. 57(5), 589–593. doi: https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.57.5.589 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentThe American Journal of Occupational Therapy Search Advanced Search AOTA Taxonomy: Evidence-Based Practice This content is only available via PDF. Copyright © 2003 by the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc.2003 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.046 | 0.123 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".