MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045431588 · doi:10.1353/jmh.2008.0121

Revolutionary War Almanac (review)

2008· article· en· W2045431588 on OpenAlex
John Buchanan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Military History · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArchaeology and Natural History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPortraitHistoryIndex (typography)PityArt historyPassionClassicsSkepticismArchivistOfficerPaintingLiteratureArtPhilosophyTheologyArchaeologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Revolutionary War Almanac John Buchanan Revolutionary War Almanac. By John C. Fredriksen . New York: Facts on File, 2006. ISBN 0-8160-5997-7. Maps. Illustrations. Bibliography. Index. Pp. 762. $85.00. We all make mistakes. There is an embarrassing blooper in one of my books that I was unaware of until a reader, a poet with a passion for history, informed me of it. When we met we had a good laugh. No such leeway, however, is allowed compilers of reference books, for the rest of us are dependent upon them for basic facts. Mr. Fredriksen has divided his work into two sections: a chronology of events, 1763-1783, and an historical dictionary, mostly of people, but also events. In addition to the bibliography, there are "Further Readings" following each entry in the historical dictionary, of which more later. The author is very proud of the illustrations he has gathered, yet many are commonplace, although a few are rarely seen and are of interest. What a pity, then, that the alleged image of the great Creek leader, Alexander McGillivray (p. 507), of whom no known image exists, is in fact a 1790 John Trumbull sketch of one of McGillivray's bitter enemies in the Creek Nation, Hoboithle Mico. The [End Page 563] purported portrait of the British officer Patrick Ferguson (p. 364) is a 1970 painting by a modern artist, yet the source, King's Mountain National Military Park, also holds a contemporary image of Ferguson. Other errors abound, but space allows me to list only a few. Sir William Howe began landing troops on Staten Island on 2 July 1776, not 3 July. Sir Henry Clinton, not Howe, discovered the American weak point at Jamaica Pass prior to the Battle of Long Island. The Arnold expedition to Quebec sailed from Newburyport, Massachusetts, on 19 September 1776, not 6 September. General Burgoyne's army was at Fish Creek near Saratoga, not Fishkill, a village in the southern Hudson Valley. In 1780 the British expeditionary force invading South Carolina landed on Simmons (now Seabrook) Island, not Johns Island, to which it crossed later. American survivors of the Battle of Camden joined Horatio Gates three days later 120 miles northward at Hillsboro, North Carolina, not Charlotte, sixty miles northward, where Gates made a brief stop. The Battle of King's Mountain did not begin "early in the morning" (p. 462), as the Rebels arrived at the base of the ridge at 3:00 p.m on the day of the battle. And the battle could not have stripped Cornwallis of "his best light infantry" (p. 190), since the only light infantry of the 1000-odd men under Major Patrick Ferguson were about eighty soldiers of the American Volunteers, a Tory provincial unit. The overwhelming loss of light troops came at the Battle of Cowpens, where Mr. Fredriksen gets it partially right. (His problem, I believe, is confusing militia with light troops.) Nathanael Greene took command of the Southern Department on 3 December 1780, not 2 December, the day he arrived in Charlotte. Greene did not send Daniel Morgan "on a sweep of North Carolina" (p. 404), but across the Catawba river to establish a presence in western South Carolina. At the Battle of Cowpens, Colonel Otho Holland Williams could not have "ordered his men to meet a body of Highlanders" (p. 339), for at the time he was about 100 miles away. Lieutenant Colonel John Eager Howard, who did command the regulars at Cowpens, which the author gets right under Howard's entry, did not mistake Morgan's orders and begin a withdrawal, which actually came about when a subordinate officer mistook Howard's order. The chronology, however, has another version, in which the regulars "suddenly feign a retreat" (p. 196). The Battle of Guilford Courthouse was fought on 15 March 1781, not 19 March (p. 404), although the author has the date right on p. 409. Isaac Huger was a general, not a colonel, at Guilford Courthouse, yet under Huger's entry Mr. Fredriksen gives the correct date of his promotion to general. The intrepid commander of Cornwallis's 33rd Foot, Lieutenant Colonel James Webster, was not killed in...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Review
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Not applicablelow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Review
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Not applicablehigh
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.895

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it