MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045431588 · doi:10.1353/jmh.2008.0121

Revolutionary War Almanac (review)

2008· article· en· W2045431588 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John Buchanan

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Military History · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArchaeology and Natural History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPortraitHistoryIndex (typography)PityArt historyPassionClassicsSkepticismArchivistOfficerPaintingLiteratureArtPhilosophyTheologyArchaeologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Revolutionary War Almanac John Buchanan Revolutionary War Almanac. By John C. Fredriksen . New York: Facts on File, 2006. ISBN 0-8160-5997-7. Maps. Illustrations. Bibliography. Index. Pp. 762. $85.00. We all make mistakes. There is an embarrassing blooper in one of my books that I was unaware of until a reader, a poet with a passion for history, informed me of it. When we met we had a good laugh. No such leeway, however, is allowed compilers of reference books, for the rest of us are dependent upon them for basic facts. Mr. Fredriksen has divided his work into two sections: a chronology of events, 1763-1783, and an historical dictionary, mostly of people, but also events. In addition to the bibliography, there are "Further Readings" following each entry in the historical dictionary, of which more later. The author is very proud of the illustrations he has gathered, yet many are commonplace, although a few are rarely seen and are of interest. What a pity, then, that the alleged image of the great Creek leader, Alexander McGillivray (p. 507), of whom no known image exists, is in fact a 1790 John Trumbull sketch of one of McGillivray's bitter enemies in the Creek Nation, Hoboithle Mico. The [End Page 563] purported portrait of the British officer Patrick Ferguson (p. 364) is a 1970 painting by a modern artist, yet the source, King's Mountain National Military Park, also holds a contemporary image of Ferguson. Other errors abound, but space allows me to list only a few. Sir William Howe began landing troops on Staten Island on 2 July 1776, not 3 July. Sir Henry Clinton, not Howe, discovered the American weak point at Jamaica Pass prior to the Battle of Long Island. The Arnold expedition to Quebec sailed from Newburyport, Massachusetts, on 19 September 1776, not 6 September. General Burgoyne's army was at Fish Creek near Saratoga, not Fishkill, a village in the southern Hudson Valley. In 1780 the British expeditionary force invading South Carolina landed on Simmons (now Seabrook) Island, not Johns Island, to which it crossed later. American survivors of the Battle of Camden joined Horatio Gates three days later 120 miles northward at Hillsboro, North Carolina, not Charlotte, sixty miles northward, where Gates made a brief stop. The Battle of King's Mountain did not begin "early in the morning" (p. 462), as the Rebels arrived at the base of the ridge at 3:00 p.m on the day of the battle. And the battle could not have stripped Cornwallis of "his best light infantry" (p. 190), since the only light infantry of the 1000-odd men under Major Patrick Ferguson were about eighty soldiers of the American Volunteers, a Tory provincial unit. The overwhelming loss of light troops came at the Battle of Cowpens, where Mr. Fredriksen gets it partially right. (His problem, I believe, is confusing militia with light troops.) Nathanael Greene took command of the Southern Department on 3 December 1780, not 2 December, the day he arrived in Charlotte. Greene did not send Daniel Morgan "on a sweep of North Carolina" (p. 404), but across the Catawba river to establish a presence in western South Carolina. At the Battle of Cowpens, Colonel Otho Holland Williams could not have "ordered his men to meet a body of Highlanders" (p. 339), for at the time he was about 100 miles away. Lieutenant Colonel John Eager Howard, who did command the regulars at Cowpens, which the author gets right under Howard's entry, did not mistake Morgan's orders and begin a withdrawal, which actually came about when a subordinate officer mistook Howard's order. The chronology, however, has another version, in which the regulars "suddenly feign a retreat" (p. 196). The Battle of Guilford Courthouse was fought on 15 March 1781, not 19 March (p. 404), although the author has the date right on p. 409. Isaac Huger was a general, not a colonel, at Guilford Courthouse, yet under Huger's entry Mr. Fredriksen gives the correct date of his promotion to general. The intrepid commander of Cornwallis's 33rd Foot, Lieutenant Colonel James Webster, was not killed in...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Review
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Not applicablelow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Review
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Not applicablehigh
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.210

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0630.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Military HistorySame topicArchaeology and Natural HistoryFrench-language works237,207