Susceptibility of five species of thrips to different strains of the entomopathogenic fungus, Beauveria bassiana
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The susceptibilities of five thrips species, Frankliniella intonsa, F. occidentalis, Thrips coloratus, T. hawaiiensis, and T. tabaci, to three isolates of an entomopathogenic fungus, Beauveria bassiana (isolates AZA38, GOM03, and KOG02), were investigated under laboratory conditions. Among the three fungal isolates, the five thrips species were the most susceptible to isolate KOG02 when inoculated with conidial suspensions at a concentration of 1×107 conidia/ml. Females of F. intonsa were more susceptible to the fungi than males, while males of F. occidentalis and T. coloratus were more susceptible than females. Both males and females of T. hawaiiensis were highly susceptible to isolate KOG02. T. tabaci was highly susceptible to isolate KOG02, even by inoculation of the conidial suspension at a concentration of 1×106 conidia/ml. Although isolates AZA38 and GOM03 exhibited weaker pathogenicity to the five thrips species than did isolate KOG02, the gross mortality increased significantly with the inoculation of these two isolates as compared with the control.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".