MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045466579 · doi:10.1303/aez.2005.667

Susceptibility of five species of thrips to different strains of the entomopathogenic fungus, Beauveria bassiana

2005· article· en· W2045466579 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Entomology and Zoology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEntomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control
Canadian institutionsPlant Biotechnology Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeauveria bassianaBiologyThripsConidiumEntomopathogenic fungusBassianaFungusInoculationWestern flower thripsBiological pest controlPathogenicityBeauveriaBotanyMicrobiologyHorticultureThripidae

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The susceptibilities of five thrips species, Frankliniella intonsa, F. occidentalis, Thrips coloratus, T. hawaiiensis, and T. tabaci, to three isolates of an entomopathogenic fungus, Beauveria bassiana (isolates AZA38, GOM03, and KOG02), were investigated under laboratory conditions. Among the three fungal isolates, the five thrips species were the most susceptible to isolate KOG02 when inoculated with conidial suspensions at a concentration of 1×107 conidia/ml. Females of F. intonsa were more susceptible to the fungi than males, while males of F. occidentalis and T. coloratus were more susceptible than females. Both males and females of T. hawaiiensis were highly susceptible to isolate KOG02. T. tabaci was highly susceptible to isolate KOG02, even by inoculation of the conidial suspension at a concentration of 1×106 conidia/ml. Although isolates AZA38 and GOM03 exhibited weaker pathogenicity to the five thrips species than did isolate KOG02, the gross mortality increased significantly with the inoculation of these two isolates as compared with the control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.711
Threshold uncertainty score0.956

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it