NUP98-HOXA10hd-Expanded Hematopoietic Stem Cells Efficiently Reconstitute Bone Marrow of Mismatched Recipients and Induce Tolerance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gene therapy as well as methods capable of returning cells to a pluripotent state (iPS) have enabled the correction of genetic deficiencies in syngenic adult progenitors, reducing the need for immunosuppression in cell therapy approaches. However, in diseases involving mutations that lead to the complete lack of a protein, such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy, the main immunogens leading to rejection of transplanted cells are the therapeutic proteins themselves. In these cases even iPS cells would not circumvent the need for immunosuppression, and alternative strategies must be developed. One such potential strategy seeks to induce immune tolerance using hematopoietic stem cells originated from the same donor or iPS line from which the therapeutic progenitors are derived. However, donor hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are available in limiting numbers and embryonic stem (ES) cell-derived HSCs engraft poorly in adults. While these limitations have been circumvented by ectopic expression of HOXB4, overexpression of this protein is associated with inefficient lymphoid reconstitution. Here we show that adult HSCs expanded with a NUP98- HOXA10hd fusion protein sustain long-term engraftment in immunologically mismatched recipients and generate normal numbers of lymphoid cells. In addition, NUP98-HOXA10hd-expanded cells induce functional immune tolerance to a subsequent transplant of myogenic progenitors immunologically matched with the transplanted HSCs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".