Texture formation under phase ordering and phase separation in polymer-liquid crystal mixtures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Computational modeling of texture formation in coupled phase separation-phase ordering processes in polymer/liquid crystal mixtures is performed using a unified model based on the nematic tensor order parameter and gradient orientation elasticity. The computational methods are able to resolve defect nucleation, defect-defect interactions, and defect-particle interactions, as well as global and local morphological features in the concentration and order parameter spatiotemporal behavior. Biphasic structures corresponding to polymer dispersed liquid crystals (PDLCs), crystalline filled nematic (CFNs), and random filled nematics (RFNs) are captured and analyzed using liquid crystal defect physics and structure factors. Under spinodal decomposition due to concentration fluctuations, the PDLC structure emerges, and the nucleation and repulsive interaction of defects within nematic droplets leads to bipolar nematic droplets. Under spinodal decomposition due to ordering fluctuations, the CFNs structure emerges, and the stable polymer droplet crystal is pinned by a lattice of topological defects. For intermediate cases, where the mixture is unstable to both concentration and nematic order fluctuations, the RFN structure emerges, and polymer droplets and fibrils are pinned by a defect network, whose density increases with the curvature of the polymer-liquid crystal interface. The simulations provide an information of the role of topological defects on phase separation-phase ordering processes in polymer-liquid crystal mixtures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".