MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045488382 · doi:10.1103/physreve.64.011701

Thermal diffuse x-ray scattering in a model columnar liquid crystal

2001· article· en· W2045488382 on OpenAlexaff
André Lacombe, A. Caillé

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLiquid Crystal Research Advancements
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCondensed matter physicsAnisotropyScatteringLiquid crystalThermalLattice (music)Materials scienceMaximaCrystal (programming language)Hexagonal latticeWide-angle X-ray scatteringPhase (matter)PhysicsMolecular physicsOpticsNeutron scatteringSmall-angle neutron scatteringThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fluctuation correlation functions and the density-density correlation functions for a realistic model of a columnar liquid crystal in its helically ordered phase are derived. The influence of positional and orientational molecular fluctuations on the thermal diffuse x-ray scattering is studied within a three-dimensional model of columns inscribed on a triangular lattice. Resulting from quasi-long-range ordering, very anisotropic long-tail scattered intensities are predicted, giving a nonuniversal signature for the helically ordered columnar liquid crystal phase. Scattered intensities both near the Bragg maxima at the inverse lattice vectors and at the Bragg condition due to periodic orientational ordering are treated. The percolation of the long-range behavior for a screw variable composed of two quantities having only quasi-long-range behavior is predicted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topicsSame topicLiquid Crystal Research AdvancementsFrench-language works237,207