Inhaled Nitric Oxide for Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to determine whether, for preterm newborn infants with respiratory disease, inhaled nitric oxide reduced the rates of death, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intracranial hemorrhage, or neurodevelopmental disability. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, Healthstar, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials using the search terms "nitric oxide," "clinical trial," and "newborn" and covering 1985-2006. We also searched abstracts of the Pediatric Academic Societies. RESULTS: Eleven randomized, controlled trials of inhaled nitric oxide therapy for preterm infants were found. The trials were grouped into 3 categories according to the entry criteria, that is, entry in the first 3 days of life on the basis of oxygenation criteria (early rescue), enrollment after 3 days on the basis of elevated risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and routine use for intubated preterm infants. Early rescue treatment based on oxygenation criteria did not seem to affect mortality or bronchopulmonary dysplasia rates. Routine use for intubated preterm infants showed a barely significant reduction in the incidence of the combined outcome of death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (relative risk [RR]: 0.91 [95% confidence limits (CLs): 0.84, 0.99]). Later treatment based on the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia showed no significant effect on this outcome. Early rescue treatment showed a trend toward increased incidence of severe intracranial hemorrhage, whereas routine use for intubated preterm infants seemed to show a reduction in the incidence of either severe intracranial hemorrhage or periventricular leukomalacia (RR: 0.70 [95% CLs: 0.53, 0.91]). CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled nitric oxide as rescue therapy for very ill preterm infants undergoing ventilation does not seem to be effective and may increase severe intracranial hemorrhage. Later use of inhaled nitric oxide to prevent bronchopulmonary dysplasia does not seem to be effective. Early routine use of inhaled nitric oxide for mildly sick, preterm infants seems to decrease the risk of serious brain injury and may improve rates of survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".