MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045508612 · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181c55d02

Thalamic nuclei activity in idiopathic generalized epilepsy

2009· article· en· W2045508612 on OpenAlexafffund
Louise Tyvaert, Serge Chassagnon, Abbas F. Sadikot, Pierre LeVan, François Dubeau, Jean Gotman

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsThalamusNeuroscienceSpike-and-waveElectroencephalographyEpilepsyNucleusIdiopathic generalized epilepsyStimulationPsychologyChemistryAnatomyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Idiopathic generalized epilepsies (IGE) are characterized by specific EEG changes including 3- to 5-Hz generalized spike-and-wave discharges. The thalamus and its cortical interactions are considered essential in the production and propagation of spike-and-wave discharges. In animal studies, corticoreticular and limbic system property changes have been observed in absence seizures and during spike-and-wave discharges and suggest the involvement of different types of thalamic nuclei. With the development of deep brain stimulation in epilepsy, the role of the thalamic nuclei needs to be clarified in human IGE. METHODS: Ten patients with IGE were recorded using 3T EEG-fMRI during spike-and-wave discharges. Hemodynamic response functions were calculated for 4 regions of interest corresponding to the anterior thalamic and centromedian and parafascicular (CM-Pf) nuclei of each thalamus. The time to peak of the hemodynamic response function was compared within thalamic structures (left compared to right) and between structures (anterior thalamic compared to CM-Pf nucleus). RESULTS: CM-Pf and anterior nucleus are both activated during GSWDs. However, the positive time to peak in the CM-Pf (4.4 +/- 2.5 s) occurred significantly earlier than in the anterior nucleus (7.6 +/- 3.2 s). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated in humans the involvement of the centromedian and parafascicular part of the corticoreticular system and of the anterior nucleus part of the limbic system during generalized spike-and-wave discharges. The different time courses suggest that the posterior intralaminar nuclei may be involved in epileptic discharge initiation or early propagation, while the anterior nucleus may only play a role in its maintenance. These results may help to understand the clinical effect of deep brain stimulation within thalamic nuclei in intractable idiopathic generalized epilepsy patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score0.413

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations123
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207