MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045510170 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.046403

Anomalous Quasiparticle Renormalization in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>Na</mml:mi><mml:mn>0.73</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>CoO</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math>: Role of Interorbital Interactions and Magnetic Correlations

2007· article· lv· W2045510170 on OpenAlexaff
J. Geck, С. В. Борисенко, H. Berger, H. Eschrig, M. Knupfer, Klaus Koepernik, A. Koitzsch, A. A. Kordyuk, V. B. Zabolotnyy, B. Büchner

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2007
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuasiparticlePhysicsRenormalizationAnisotropyCondensed matter physicsQuantum mechanicsSuperconductivity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report an angular resolved photoemission study of ${\mathrm{Na}}_{x}{\mathrm{CoO}}_{2}$ with $x\ensuremath{\simeq}0.73$ where it is found that the renormalization of the quasiparticle (QP) dispersion changes dramatically upon a rotation from $\ensuremath{\Gamma}\mathrm{M}$ to $\ensuremath{\Gamma}\mathrm{K}$. The comparison of the experimental data to the calculated band structure reveals that the quasiparticle renormalization is most pronounced along the $\ensuremath{\Gamma}\mathrm{K}$ direction, while it is significantly weaker along the $\ensuremath{\Gamma}\mathrm{M}$ direction. We discuss the observed anisotropy in terms of multiorbital effects and point out the relevance of magnetic correlations for the band structure of ${\mathrm{Na}}_{x}{\mathrm{CoO}}_{2}$ with $x\ensuremath{\simeq}0.75$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicMagnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materialsFrench-language works237,207