MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045533580 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.74.195116

Localized light orbitals: Basis states for three-dimensional photonic crystal microscale circuits

2006· article· en· W2045533580 on OpenAlexaff
Hiroyuki Takeda, Alongkarn Chutinan, Sajeev John

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhotonic Crystals and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotonic crystalPhysicsBloch waveWannier functionElectromagnetic fieldPolarization (electrochemistry)Atomic orbitalPlane wave expansionPhotonicsDelocalized electronBasis functionClassification of discontinuitiesOpticsCondensed matter physicsQuantum mechanicsElectronMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We demonstrate the utility of three-dimensional (3D) optical Wannier functions (WF's) for quantitative description of electromagnetic wave localization and propagation in 3D photonic band gap (PBG) microcircuits. Using these localized ``optical orbitals'' we reconstruct electromagnetic waveguiding in bulk two-dimensional (2D) and 3D PBG materials, 2D-3D PBG heterostructures composed of 3D PBG structures inserted with 2D microchip layers, and 2D membrane photonic crystals. In 3D photonic crystal circuits, the expansion of electromagnetic fields with typically less than 20 maximally localized WF's (MLWF's) simplifies the calculation of electromagnetic phenomena of spectral bandwidth surrounding the PBG and improves computational efficiency, compared to the plane wave expansion and the finite-difference time-domain methods. The MLWF's are defined by a unitary transformation on the extended Bloch mode basis, chosen to minimize a wave function delocalization functional, while retaining symmetries of the underlying Bloch modes. We introduce an effective approach to constructing modified MLWF's in 3D architectures involving surface polarization charges and electromagnetic field discontinuities. These modified optical orbitals are also corrected for Gibbs phenomena arising near sharp dielectric interfaces. We demonstrate the accuracy of our localized light orbital method for recapturing TM and TE modes in idealized 2D photonic crystals and mixed polarization waveguide modes in 3D architectures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.601
Threshold uncertainty score0.866

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review BSame topicPhotonic Crystals and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207