MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045560982 · doi:10.1080/146166800750035530

The geography of a tourist business: Hotel distribution and urban development in Xiamen, China

2000· article· en· W2045560982 on OpenAlexaff
Stéphane Bégin

Bibliographic record

VenueTourism Geographies · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Aspects of Tourism Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourismChinaEconomic geographyDistribution (mathematics)GeographyTourism geographyUrban geographyRegional scienceUrban tourismUrban planningCivil engineeringEngineeringArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper examines the evolution of hotel location in the city of Xiamen, in the People's Republic of China. It shows that this distribution has changed consider ably with the growth of tourism, as well as the profound changes that have been affecting Chinese cities in the past 20 years. The article takes a look at urban tourist morphology, drawing parallels with distribution patterns observed else where, particularly Ashworth and Tunbridge's model of hotel location. Starting with an inventory of hotels, it examines the evolution of distribution patterns according to opening dates, size of establishments and category of hotels. These patterns are then analysed according to a morphology of the city that takes into account its recent evolution, more particularly the spatial impact of the Special Economic Zone, increased urban development and the emergence of a new down town. It concludes by putting in evidence the convergence of models of hotel location and introduces a few implications for further development

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score0.270

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations76
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTourism GeographiesSame topicDiverse Aspects of Tourism ResearchFrench-language works237,207