MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045577917 · doi:10.2118/165531-pa

Optimal Application Conditions of Solvent Injection Into Oil Sands To Minimize the Effect of Asphaltene Deposition: An Experimental Investigation

2014· article· en· W2045577917 on OpenAlex
Laura Moreno-Arciniegas, Tayfun Babadagli

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsphalteneSolventHydrocarbonAlkaneChemistryOil sandsChemical engineeringLight crude oilSynthetic crudeDistillationHexanePetroleumPropaneOrganic chemistryChromatographyMaterials scienceAsphaltShale oilComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Solvent injection into heavy-oil reservoirs is quite complex because of the asphaltene destabilization that occurs because of the changes in temperature, pressure, and solvent type dissolved in oil. As a result of this destabilization, the asphaltene flocculates, agglomerates, and eventually plugs the pores in the reservoir because of the formation of asphaltene clusters. In solvent applications, light-molecular-weight hydrocarbon solvents are preferred because of their high diffusion coefficient; however, as the carbon number of n-alkane solvents decreases, asphaltene precipitation increases. Therefore, the selection of the solvent and application condition is highly critical in cold and thermally aided solvent applications. In this research, low-carbon-number n-alkane (propane, n-hexane, and n-decane) and a distillate-hydrocarbon (obtained from a heavy-oil-upgrading facility) injection into glass-bead-pack systems saturated with heavy oil (87,651 and 20,918 cp at 25°C) were evaluated at different pressure conditions that are applicable to typical Canadian oil-sand reservoirs (698–2068 kPa) and temperatures (25–120°C). First, the asphaltene behavior of different solvents at different pressures and temperatures was studied through deasphalting work in a pressure/volume/temperature (PVT) cell in previous work [Moreno and Babadagli (2013)]. By use of quantitative (amount of asphaltene precipitated) and qualitative (microscopic images of asphaltene clusters) observations, asphaltenes were classified in terms of their shape, size, and quantity for different oil/solvent types, pressure, and temperature. Continually, the same n-alkane, distillate-hydrocarbon solvents, and heavy oil were used in gravity-stable-displacement glass-bead-pack experiments. 3-D (cylindrical) glass-bead-pack experiments were carried out at the same temperature and pressure conditions used for the PVT experiments. The operational conditions, oil composition, and solvent type showed significant effects on oil-recovery factor. Asphaltene deposition and residual oil saturation (ROS) in the glass-bead pack and the amount of asphaltene in the produced oil were measured, and the standard saturate, aromatic, resin, and asphaltene (SARA) analysis was applied to determine the optimal operating conditions yielding the highest recoveries with minimal pore plugging. Moreover, the pore-plugging process was analyzed through a visual scanning electron microscope (SEM) and optical microscope to find the different organic deposition formation and agglomeration. Oil production was evaluated by use of microscope visualization, viscosity reduction, and refractive-index values. Eventually, optimal application conditions for solvent and thermally aided solvent injection were listed for a wide range of heavy-oil and solvent types.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.228
Threshold uncertainty score0.688

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it