MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045595543 · doi:10.1111/jzs.12079

Review and meta-analysis of natural selection in mitochondrial complex I in metazoans

2014· article· en· W2045595543 on OpenAlexaff
Michael R. Garvin, Joseph P. Bielawski, Leonid A. Sazanov, Anthony J. Gharrett

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Zoological Systematics & Evolutionary Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPhysiological and biochemical adaptations
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersRasmuson Foundation
KeywordsBiologyNatural selectionEvolutionary biologySelection (genetic algorithm)ZoologyComputational biologyArtificial intelligenceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Variation in mitochondrial DNA is often assumed to be neutral and is used to construct the genealogical relationships among populations and species. However, if extant variation is the result of episodes of positive selection, these genealogies may be incorrect, although this information itself may provide biologically and evolutionary meaningful information. In fact, positive Darwinian selection has been detected in the mitochondrial-encoded subunits that comprise complex I from diverse taxa with seemingly dissimilar bioenergetic life histories, but the functional implications of the selected sites are unknown. Complex I produces roughly 40% of the proton flux that is used to synthesize ATP from ADP, and a functional model based on the high-resolution structure of complex I described a unique biomechanical apparatus for proton translocation. We reported positive selection at sites in this apparatus during the evolution of Pacific salmon, and it appeared this was also the case in published reports from other taxa, but a comparison among studies was difficult because different statistical tests were used to detect selection and oftentimes, specific sites were not reported. Here we review the literature of positive selection in mitochondrial genomes, the statistical tests used to detect selection, and the structural and functional models that are currently available to study the physiological implications of selection. We then search for signatures of positive selection among the coding mitochondrial genomes of 237 species with a common set of tests and verify that the ND5 subunit of complex I is a repeated target of positive Darwinian selection in diverse taxa. We propose a novel hypothesis to explain the results based on their bioenergetic life histories and provide a guide for laboratory and field studies to test this hypothesis. Revision y Meta-analisis de Seleccion Natural en Complejo Mitochondrial I en Metazoans La variacion en el ADN mitocondrial se asume frecuentemente como neutral y es usada para construir las relaciones genealogicas entre poblaciones y especies. Sin embargo, si la variacion existente es el resultado de episodios de seleccion positiva, estas genealogias pueden ser incorrectas, aunque la informacion por si misma puede proveer informacion biologica y evolutiva relevante. De hecho, se ha detectado seleccion darwiniana positiva en subunidades mitocondriales codificantes que incluyen el complejo I de diversos taxa con historias bioenergeticas disimiles, aunque las implicancias funcionales de los sitios seleccionados son desconocidas. El complejo I produce aproximadamente el 40% del flujo de protones que es usado para sintetizar ATP a partir del ADP, y un modelo funcional basado en la estructura de alta resolucion el complejo I describio un aparato biomecanico unico para la translocacion de protones. Reportamos seleccion positiva en sitios de este aparato durante la evolucion del salmon del Pacifico, y aparentemente este fue el caso en publicaciones de otros taxa, pero la comparacion entre estudios resulta dificultosa debido al uso de diferentes analisis estadisticos para detectar seleccion y en muchos casos no se reportan sitios especificos. En el presente estudio, revisamos la bibliografia a cerca de la seleccion positiva en el genoma mitocondrial, los analisis estadisticos utilizados para la deteccion de la seleccion, asi como los modelos estructurales y funcionales disponibles actualmente para el estudio de las implicancias fisiologicas de la seleccion. Asimismo se realizo la busqueda de las huellas de la seleccion positiva entre los genomas mitocondriales codificantes de 237 especies con un set comun de analisis y se verifico que la subunidad ND5 del complejo I es un blanco repetido de seleccion positiva darwiniana en diversos taxa. Proponemos una novedosa hipotesis para explicar los resultados basados en la historia bioenergetica y proveemos una guia para estudios de laboratorio y campo para poner a prueba dichas hipotesis

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0070.007
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.168
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations108
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Zoological Systematics & Evolutionary ResearchSame topicPhysiological and biochemical adaptationsFrench-language works237,207