MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045613032 · doi:10.1097/jsm.0b013e3182856046

The Utility of Ultrasound in Detecting Anterior Compartment Thickness Changes in Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome

2013· article· en· W2045613032 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Journal of Sport Medicine · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMuscle and Compartmental Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersStryker
KeywordsMedicineCompartment (ship)ExertionTreadmillCompartment SyndromesSurgeryInternal medicineCardiologyAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that patients with chronic exertional compartment syndrome (CECS) of the anterior leg compartment have an increased anterior compartment thickness (ACT) compared with control subjects after exertion using ultrasound. DESIGN: Prospective comparison study. SETTING: Diagnostic imaging department of a tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Four patients with CECS and 9 control subjects. INTERVENTIONS: Patients with CECS and control subjects ran on a treadmill for up to 10 minutes. Anterior compartment thickness (both groups) and anterior compartment pressure (CECS patients) were measured before exertion and at scheduled intervals after exertion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Anterior compartment thickness, percentage change in ACT from rest, and compartment pressure. RESULTS: Anterior compartment pressures were diagnostic of CECS using the modified Pedowitz criteria in patients with CECS. Mean percentage change in ACT from rest in patients with CECS versus control subjects at 0.5 minutes was 21.3% versus 6.32% [95% confidence interval (CI), 6.92-35.6 and 0.094-12.5, respectively; P = 0.011]; at 2.5 minutes, it was 24.6% versus 4.22% (95% CI, 10.7-38.5 and -1.85-10.3, respectively; P = 0.003); and at 4.5 minutes, it was 24.9% versus 5.08% (95% CI, 14.3-35.5 and -0.813-11.0, respectively; P = 0.003). Mean ACT in patients with CECS versus control subjects significantly increased after exertion (P = 0.003) at 0.5 minutes, 2.5 minutes, and 4.5 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonography reveals a significant increase in ACT in patients with CECS of the anterior leg compartment. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings with the goal of developing anterior leg compartment CECS ultrasound diagnostic criteria and exploring the role of using ultrasound to diagnose CECS in other compartments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.885

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it