MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045626557 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2010.5575108

A robust digital audio watermarking algorithm using Empirical Mode Decomposition

2010· article· en· W2045626557 on OpenAlexaff
ANK Zaman, K. M. Ibrahim Khalilullah, Md. Wahedul Islam

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigital watermarkingHilbert–Huang transformComputer scienceRobustness (evolution)AlgorithmReverberationSpeech recognitionSignal processingAudio signal processingAudio signalFrequency domainDiscrete cosine transformQuantization (signal processing)Digital signal processingArtificial intelligenceSpeech codingWhite noiseComputer visionAcousticsTelecommunicationsComputer hardware

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we proposed a new algorithm for digital audio watermarking process using Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) and Hilbert Transform (HT). The host audio signal is decomposed into several Intrinsic Mode Functions (IMFs). A set of -1 and 1, which is obtained by mapping from standard normal distributed pseudo random numbers, is embedded as secret information into the IMF containing highest energy. Thus selected IMF is less sensitive with common signal processing attack. As a result this method increases robustness. The experimental results show that the proposed method has good imperceptibility and robustness under common signal processing attacks such as additive noise (in time domain and in frequency domain), low pass filtering, re-sampling, re-quantization, MP3 compression, and sound processing effects such as, delay, a natural sounding reverberation (Schroeder's Reverberator), flanging effect, equalization effect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score0.607

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking TechniquesFrench-language works237,207